Adobe Hits Eleven on the Irony Scale

I learn from Cali Lewis via her twitter feed that Adobe are talking about developing a version of Flash for the iPhone.

Paul Betlem, Sr. Director of Engineering at Adobe Systems confirmed that Adobe is working on Flash for iPhone. He was speaking at the Flash On the Beach Conference and said, “My team is working on Flash on the iPhone, but it’s a closed platform.”

Am I the only person to find it deeply ironic that Adobe should complain that the iPhone is a closed platform when their own web platform ‘Flash’ is closed, and they have no intention of opening it up.

Welcome to our world of pain Adobe.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
This entry was posted in Advocacy, Linux, Rant, Ubuntu. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

7 Comments

  1. Posted September 30, 2008 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    I don’t quite get this; you can deploy and run whatever you like on Flash. The platform is open. The implementation is closed to a degree. But they do publish specs and source code to some things.

    Most of this ire is centered around the flash plugin’s lack of 64bit I imagine. And maybe their missing PPC/ARM builds. I agree that it sucks, but wouldn’t it be far more productive to test, patch and promote Gnash?

      More from author
  2. Alan Pope
    Posted October 1, 2008 at 12:10 am | Permalink

    I think you may be over interpreting my amusement. Of course I’m drawing a parallel between the fact that Flash is not open – in that Adobe implemented it in a closed source way – and that the iPhone is also a somewhat closed development platform.

    Personally I use SWFDEC, not Gnash because in my experience it works. I don’t believe that taking 5 minutes out on my blog is adversely affecting my ability to test free software alternatives to Flash though.

  3. Bjørn
    Posted September 30, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Actually, the flash specs are freely available through the Open Screen Project (atleast according to wikipedia, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash#Specifications )

  4. Alan Pope
    Posted October 1, 2008 at 12:10 am | Permalink

    The spec may be, the implementation isn’t.

  5. Posted October 1, 2008 at 3:11 am | Permalink

    Drinking the PR koolaid? The specs are totally far from being sufficient to write an independent implementation.

      More from author
  6. Posted October 1, 2008 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    The year – 2009. The platform – Linux 64bit. The problem – _still_ no 64bit flash. Or acrobat reader.

    So Adobe technologies are on my blacklist.

      More from author
  7. Posted October 2, 2008 at 2:36 am | Permalink

    Say what you want, but Acrobat.com works with Flash 10, and I dumped Google Docs very quickly after going over it’s capabilities. It just so much more high-quality and well thought out.

    Adobe AIR beta for Linux is rocking also, it has some great applications. And just to think – the developers has to do zero – and I repepat, zero, not even recompiling to have his app be cross-platform. That is amazing.

    I’m on 64bit by the way.

      More from author

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Additional comments powered by BackType